what's the point in just copy/pasting someone else's news? I think I missed something here...
i thought it was a good comment!
if you think someone is wasting your time then you can either ignore them or have a go
I was really just confused and hoping he could fill me in...
i thought the message was in the sarcastic last sentence
might be wrong there tho - sarcasm is difficult to encode in utf8
I thought that story about Annie Lennox was mildly amusing, and so passed it on. I think Bob might better spend his time finding music or amusing and diverting things to write about himself, rather than cutting and pasting and scribbling the odd semi-literate half sentence.
I couldn't actually see that he'd added anything to the copy/paste! thanks, Paul
im not sure its upto us to decide how best people should spend time luke sir.
I wasn't deciding, I was suggesting.
I don't see why a comment such as that warrants content status, but there you go.
Indeed. This content thing is a fucking mess. I don't want to read illiterate retards driveling on about bullcrap or twats from the broan jonestown massacre trying to book fucking tours!
If someone wants to say "that article is crap" they should be able to add it to a comments section at the bottom of the article like a fucking normal, decent internet hangout. You do not give lunatics control of the asylum, it gets fucking WEIRD and LAME and BORING (and covered in SHIT)
adam - they can add comments to a story. bob1 just chose to make it content instead.
Well I guess there could be an argument for keeping commoners out of the castle Adam
And a nice way to filter out the "illiterate retards", adam, is to only stalk people you like then just use your Home Page, which will only show you content from them.
how will i then find new stuff?
And yes, Dr Sanders, there is!
I'd like to hear it - how would you choose who got to live in the castle?
When people run into the middle of the castle and mess themselves during the Mardi Gras, you ban them. Because when the guet arrive, looking for jugglers or jousting or chicken or whatever, and they are greeted with the village idiots throwing fæces at one another, they will not sit down and discuss the price of corn, nor will they return next year.
"guests". Fuck it, ban me.
For the above, I think you deserve a seat at the high table and an extra hearty tear at the chicken leg. Perhaps even some salt.
i wonder how we're going to code chicken legs
or the castle for that matter
hence, you've finally got the fucking point, a real debate is needed and it seems the only way to achive this is to fuck with the people incharge.
congratulations, this must be the most constructive chat ever, will i get payed for my help or must i keep pimping myself on pinkforfree to maintain my watermellon habit?
and also 'LUKE' does 'the odd semi-literate half sentence' refer to your work or mine ??!!!!
adam - about finding new stuff but ignoring the "commoners" - would you prefer it if you started seeing everyone's work, but were able to selectively stop viewing people's stuff if they pissed you off? (Instead of the current method of not seeing anything and choosing only people you like to view?)
as a consumer of web stuff, having to physically filter out loads of tossers is not my job, and the idea of it pains me. That is why I put my trust in Editors. Imagine if, say The Sunday Times had an infinite letters page. It would be shit.
And less of your cos-socialist posturing, please.
*cod
your blog is not edited by someone else
and this is not the sunday times
the stalking model lets you make your own version of the sunday times by selecting writers that you expect to produce good work
or it lets you let others do that for you - you can see others' selections
I put my trust in Ediotrs. I thought 'An End Has a Start' was a vast improvement on their debut.
as reviewed by the svenhunter herein
karbron whos that
Editors have let us down, perhaps. We can be editors ourselves, however. Im not a lazy toe tag expecting those old men salivating over jumbled press releases to feed me my music isms. The very reason we do what we do is to murk out those gits. I like how great willows grow around ponds. and how strings in colours we trust is a story to follow. The castle might be there, but its common in comparison to the grounds.
we will find alot more in the exploring, and if we do it right, they edit themselves into footpaths, and
familiar yet unexpected discoveries.
The old PlayLouder that had a capital L (RIP) spent seven years murking out the gits who salivated over jumbled press releases. I hope those who contribute now still have something of a similar attitude.
then the view of the hills as you walk into the forest is beautiful, and always a little scary.
but the forests that have grown are so very very worth exploring with those that you find living there.
What about the swamps? The bilious treacherous swamps, riddled with frogs and herpes?
mighty svenhunter, that is your terrain, can you bring the swamp people together under your banner?
*kill self#
*kills self
if you weren't self, i'd do it my sellf, cunt:!!
adam go to a doctor ,,,, please