Chat: About 'he owes me a fuckin apology' by bob1 (Public)
  • 10:12, 22 Oct 2007
    melissa.fehrmelissa.fehr

    what's the point in just copy/pasting someone else's news? I think I missed something here...

  • 11:53, 22 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    i thought it was a good comment!

  • 11:53, 22 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    if you think someone is wasting your time then you can either ignore them or have a go

  • 12:52, 22 Oct 2007
    melissa.fehrmelissa.fehr

    I was really just confused and hoping he could fill me in...

  • 14:36, 22 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    i thought the message was in the sarcastic last sentence

  • 14:37, 22 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    might be wrong there tho - sarcasm is difficult to encode in utf8

  • 14:40, 22 Oct 2007
    luke.turnerluke.turner

    I thought that story about Annie Lennox was mildly amusing, and so passed it on. I think Bob might better spend his time finding music or amusing and diverting things to write about himself, rather than cutting and pasting and scribbling the odd semi-literate half sentence.

  • 14:47, 22 Oct 2007
    melissa.fehrmelissa.fehr

    I couldn't actually see that he'd added anything to the copy/paste! thanks, Paul

  • 12:33, 23 Oct 2007
    karborn

    im not sure its upto us to decide how best people should spend time luke sir.

  • 12:58, 23 Oct 2007
    luke.turnerluke.turner

    I wasn't deciding, I was suggesting.

  • 18:15, 23 Oct 2007
    thesvenhunterthesvenhunter

    I don't see why a comment such as that warrants content status, but there you go.

  • 02:41, 25 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    Indeed. This content thing is a fucking mess. I don't want to read illiterate retards driveling on about bullcrap or twats from the broan jonestown massacre trying to book fucking tours!

  • 02:44, 25 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    If someone wants to say "that article is crap" they should be able to add it to a comments section at the bottom of the article like a fucking normal, decent internet hangout. You do not give lunatics control of the asylum, it gets fucking WEIRD and LAME and BORING (and covered in SHIT)

  • 10:52, 25 Oct 2007
    melissa.fehrmelissa.fehr

    adam - they can add comments to a story. bob1 just chose to make it content instead.

  • 10:52, 25 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    Well I guess there could be an argument for keeping commoners out of the castle Adam

  • 10:53, 25 Oct 2007
    melissa.fehrmelissa.fehr

    And a nice way to filter out the "illiterate retards", adam, is to only stalk people you like then just use your Home Page, which will only show you content from them.

  • 12:24, 25 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    how will i then find new stuff?

  • 12:24, 25 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    And yes, Dr Sanders, there is!

  • 13:05, 25 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    I'd like to hear it - how would you choose who got to live in the castle?

  • 15:58, 25 Oct 2007
    thesvenhunterthesvenhunter

    When people run into the middle of the castle and mess themselves during the Mardi Gras, you ban them. Because when the guet arrive, looking for jugglers or jousting or chicken or whatever, and they are greeted with the village idiots throwing fæces at one another, they will not sit down and discuss the price of corn, nor will they return next year.

  • 15:58, 25 Oct 2007
    thesvenhunterthesvenhunter

    "guests". Fuck it, ban me.

  • 16:16, 25 Oct 2007
    luke.turnerluke.turner

    For the above, I think you deserve a seat at the high table and an extra hearty tear at the chicken leg. Perhaps even some salt.

  • 16:29, 25 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    i wonder how we're going to code chicken legs

  • 16:34, 25 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    or the castle for that matter

  • 20:19, 27 Oct 2007
    bob1bob1

    hence, you've finally got the fucking point, a real debate is needed and it seems the only way to achive this is to fuck with the people incharge.
    congratulations, this must be the most constructive chat ever, will i get payed for my help or must i keep pimping myself on pinkforfree to maintain my watermellon habit?

  • 21:44, 27 Oct 2007
    bob1bob1

    and also 'LUKE' does 'the odd semi-literate half sentence' refer to your work or mine ??!!!!

  • 10:19, 29 Oct 2007
    melissa.fehrmelissa.fehr

    adam - about finding new stuff but ignoring the "commoners" - would you prefer it if you started seeing everyone's work, but were able to selectively stop viewing people's stuff if they pissed you off? (Instead of the current method of not seeing anything and choosing only people you like to view?)

  • 12:54, 29 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    as a consumer of web stuff, having to physically filter out loads of tossers is not my job, and the idea of it pains me. That is why I put my trust in Editors. Imagine if, say The Sunday Times had an infinite letters page. It would be shit.

  • 12:55, 29 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    And less of your cos-socialist posturing, please.

  • 12:55, 29 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    *cod

  • 13:15, 29 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    your blog is not edited by someone else

  • 13:19, 29 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    and this is not the sunday times

  • 13:21, 29 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    the stalking model lets you make your own version of the sunday times by selecting writers that you expect to produce good work

  • 13:22, 29 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    or it lets you let others do that for you - you can see others' selections

  • 17:28, 29 Oct 2007
    thesvenhunterthesvenhunter

    I put my trust in Ediotrs. I thought 'An End Has a Start' was a vast improvement on their debut.

  • 17:54, 29 Oct 2007
    paul.sanderspaul.sanders

    as reviewed by the svenhunter herein

  • 20:16, 29 Oct 2007
    leeoreleeore

    karbron whos that

  • 23:37, 29 Oct 2007
    karborn

    Editors have let us down, perhaps. We can be editors ourselves, however. Im not a lazy toe tag expecting those old men salivating over jumbled press releases to feed me my music isms. The very reason we do what we do is to murk out those gits. I like how great willows grow around ponds. and how strings in colours we trust is a story to follow. The castle might be there, but its common in comparison to the grounds.

  • 23:38, 29 Oct 2007
    karborn

    we will find alot more in the exploring, and if we do it right, they edit themselves into footpaths, and
    familiar yet unexpected discoveries.

  • 00:10, 30 Oct 2007
    luke.turnerluke.turner

    The old PlayLouder that had a capital L (RIP) spent seven years murking out the gits who salivated over jumbled press releases. I hope those who contribute now still have something of a similar attitude.

  • 01:03, 30 Oct 2007
    karborn

    then the view of the hills as you walk into the forest is beautiful, and always a little scary.

  • 01:11, 30 Oct 2007
    karborn

    but the forests that have grown are so very very worth exploring with those that you find living there.

  • 10:21, 30 Oct 2007
    thesvenhunterthesvenhunter

    What about the swamps? The bilious treacherous swamps, riddled with frogs and herpes?

  • 11:21, 30 Oct 2007
    karborn

    mighty svenhunter, that is your terrain, can you bring the swamp people together under your banner?

  • 13:34, 30 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    *kill self#

  • 13:36, 30 Oct 2007
    adam.alphabetadam.alphabet

    *kills self

  • 23:52, 12 Nov 2007
    bob1bob1

    if you weren't self, i'd do it my sellf, cunt:!!

  • 21:36, 17 Nov 2007
    bob1bob1

    adam go to a doctor ,,,, please

Say Something: